Letter of Protest (LOP): Stop a Conflicting Trademark Before It Is Published

When protecting your brand, timing matters. One of the most effective yet often overlooked ways to stop a conflicting trademark before it becomes a problem is through the Letter of Protest (LOP). The LOP procedure at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) allows brand owners to bring potential issues to the attention of an examining attorney before a mark is published for opposition or, in some cases, before it even registers.

This tool can be invaluable for trademark owners who want to act quickly and cost-effectively to prevent confusion, dilution, or misuse of their marks.

What Is a Letter of Protest (LOP)?

A Letter of Protest is a formal submission to the USPTO that allows a third party to bring relevant evidence to the attention of the examining attorney handling another party’s trademark application. The key advantage of an LOP is that it enables early intervention; you don’t have to wait until a mark is published for opposition or registered to take action.

Typically, parties must wait for publication to file a formal opposition, or, in the case of trademarks on the Supplemental Register, they must wait until registration to file a cancellation. An LOP, however, can be filed as soon as an application is filed and up until its publication. In unusual cases, the USPTO may even accept an LOP shortly after publication.

By submitting an LOP early, you can flag legal issues before the application advances too far, potentially saving significant time and expense later.

When and Why to File a Letter of Protest

Filing an LOP can be the right move if you identify a pending trademark application that is confusingly similar to your own mark or otherwise violates USPTO rules.

Here’s why early filing matters:

  • Prevent brand confusion—stop infringing or misleading marks before they gain registration.
  • Protect your investment—avoid consumer confusion or dilution of brand identity.
  • Save costs—LOPs are a far more affordable alternative to a full opposition or cancellation proceeding.
  • Demonstrate active brand monitoring—show proactive effort to defend your trademark rights.

If your business monitors new trademark filings, an LOP allows you to act immediately instead of waiting weeks or months for the publication phase.

Appropriate Reasons for Filing a Letter of Protest

The USPTO has specific rules about what qualifies as a valid reason to file an LOP. These reasons must be appropriate for ex parte examination, meaning they relate to the examiner’s review of the mark rather than a dispute between two parties.

Valid Grounds for a Letter of ProtestExample Scenario
Likelihood of confusion with a prior registration or applicationA new mark uses nearly identical wording or a logo for related goods.
Descriptive or generic wordingThe mark “Crunchy Chips” for snack foods lacks distinctiveness.
False association with another partyThe mark falsely implies a connection to a known brand or individual.
Commonplace or widely used phrasePhrases like “Proud Supporter” or “Buy Local” do not function as trademarks.
The registered mark appears in the goods/services description.A competitor’s application lists your brand name within its product description.
Improper specimens of useThe specimen shows an image used by third parties.

📘 Reference: For complete USPTO guidance, see USPTO Letter of Protest Practice Tips.

Each of these grounds must be supported by credible evidence, such as screenshots, registration records, or examples of third-party use.

Inappropriate Reasons for Filing a Letter of Protest

The USPTO will not consider LOPs based on certain claims that fall outside its ex parte examination authority. Filing under these grounds will result in rejection.

Invalid GroundsWhy It’s Not Accepted
Claiming common law ownershipMust be resolved through separate legal action or opposition proceedings.
Claiming the applicant is not the true ownerOwnership disputes are not part of the examiner’s review process.
Disagreeing with the examiner’s decisionLOPs cannot be used to challenge or appeal an examiner’s judgment.

Understanding these distinctions ensures your filing meets USPTO’s procedural requirements and avoids unnecessary rejections.

How to File a Letter of Protest: Step-by-Step Process

While the process may sound straightforward, it requires careful preparation and strict adherence to USPTO standards.

Step 1: Gather Evidence

Collect clear, relevant evidence supporting your protest. This may include prior registrations, screenshots showing common usage, or images demonstrating non-distinctiveness.

Step 2: Prepare the Letter

Your submission should include:

  • A concise explanation of the issue (e.g., “Likelihood of confusion with U.S. Registration No. XXXXXXX”).
  • A list of evidence attachments.
  • The appropriate legal reasoning.

Step 3: Submit via USPTO

File the LOP online using the USPTO’s Electronic Letter of Protest Form and pay the required fee.

Step 4: USPTO Review

The USPTO will review your submission for compliance:

  • If compliant, the LOP is forwarded to the examining attorney of the protested application.
  • If not compliant, the USPTO will issue a letter explaining the reasons for rejection.

What Happens After Filing

Once accepted, the USPTO updates the application’s TSDR (Trademark Status and Document Retrieval) record to reflect:

“LETTER OF PROTEST ACCEPTED”—A memorandum and evidence are uploaded to the file, allowing the examiner to review your submission.

The examining attorney then decides how to proceed:

  • If they agree with your evidence, they may issue an Office Action to the applicant, potentially refusing the mark.
  • If not, the TSDR will show “LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED – NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN.”

If your LOP was not accepted for procedural reasons, the USPTO will provide an explanation of what didn’t meet their criteria.

This transparency ensures all parties can track the progress and outcome of the protest.

Why Early Action Matters

Trademark conflicts can escalate quickly, and the longer an application remains unchallenged, the harder it can be to reverse its registration. Filing a Letter of Protest allows you to:

  • Act early—address potential conflicts before publication.
  • Save time and legal costs—avoid lengthy opposition or cancellation proceedings.
  • Protect your brand reputation—prevent confusion among consumers.
  • Demonstrate vigilance—strengthen your brand’s credibility and enforcement history.

Consistent brand monitoring and timely filing of LOPs show your commitment to protecting your intellectual property assets. Speak with trademark specialist “Sharon Adams” today.

Seek Professional Help When Filing

Although individuals can technically file an LOP, the process involves precise legal and procedural requirements. A trademark attorney plays a critical role in:

  • Identifying valid legal grounds for protest.
  • Preparing compliant evidence and explanations.
  • Ensuring the filing meets all USPTO formatting and procedural standards.
  • Communicating effectively with the USPTO during review.

An attorney’s guidance can prevent costly errors and increase the likelihood that your protest is accepted and considered by the examining attorney.

Key Takeaways

  • A Letter of Protest offers a proactive, cost-effective tool for protecting your trademark rights.
  • It can be filed as soon as an application is submitted, long before publication or registration.
  • Only specific legal grounds are acceptable, and evidence must be well-organized and credible.
  • Early action through an LOP can prevent confusion, protect your brand’s integrity, and save you from costly legal battles later.
  • Working with an experienced trademark attorney ensures your filing meets USPTO standards and strengthens your brand’s legal position.

You can follow us on LinkedIn and YouTube to learn more about trademark services.

Posted in

Adams Law Office

Sharon Adams is a trademark attorney with over a decade of experience helping businesses protect their brands. As the founder of Adams Law Office, she focuses solely on trademark law, offering services like clearance searches, applications, renewals, and brand strategy. Sharon has secured trademarks for companies across industries, from tech and fashion to food and media. She’s a top-ranked UC Davis Law graduate and a trusted legal ally for growing businesses.

“Disclaimer: This blog post is provided by Adams Law Office for educational and informational purposes only. It is intended to offer a general overview and understanding of trademark law and related topics, not specific legal advice. The content reflects the state of the law at the time it was written and may not reflect subsequent legal developments. This material should not be used as a substitute for professional legal counsel tailored to your individual situation. For personalized legal guidance, please consult a licensed attorney.”